Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Subscribe to our RSS feed:
Marvel at the wonder of our creation
Gina Frangello

Vibrator Shopping: A Tragi-Comedy in 2,000 Words

August 27th, 2009
by Gina Frangello

CHICAGO, IL-

One day in spring, accompanied by a 50-something-year-old inorgasmic couples counselor* snapping photos for her out-of-state-lover on her cell phone, I went to a sex store that I always call Great Sexpectations, though it is actually called something else.

My friend was visiting from out of state.  I used to be a therapist, and once upon a time she was one of my supervisors.  She has quite a reputation as a hard-ass, take-no-prisoners therapist, and is in such demand she has to turn desperate couples away.  We don’t know many people in common anymore, but those we do have always looked up to her for her practical knowledge of how to make a relationship work, including in the bedroom.  For these reasons–her reputation, her position as my elder and a former mentor, and also, incidentally, for the fact that she has been married twice–you can imagine my surprise when she told me tearfully over dinner the first night of her visit that she has never had an orgasm in her entire life.

No: I don’t mean “with a partner.”  I mean Ever.

“What about masturbation?” I asked.

“I don’t do that,” she said.  ”It doesn’t work.”

“Not even with a vibrator?” I asked incredulously.  I had not . . . um . . . realized that was possible.

“I don’t have a vibrator,” she said.  ”I’m too embarrassed to buy one.”

“But what about the internet?!”

“No way!” she gasped.  ”Then they’d know where I live.”

You might say it was then that I realized we were in trouble.

Flash forward a few days, and the two of us were having lunch in my neighborhood–or I should say we were imbibing enough wine that I could get her to enter a sex shop.  During lunch, she kept getting calls on her cell from her lover.  He lives on the west coast, whereas she lives in the east, with her husband.  The lover is married too.  As she spoke about him, she began to cry.

This is the story of their love, more or less:

They met in their teens.  They dated, but the lover kept pressing my friend, whom I’ll call L, to have sex, as teenage boys are wont to do.  L, however, burst into tears of panic whenever he made these advances, and because he genuinely cared for her, the (would be) lover decided they should just be friends, because he felt like a Scummy Rapist.  However, even after L began dating other people–and married her first husband–he remained her faithful sidekick, once even moving to another city in order to be closer to L.  At that time, L felt for him only as a friend.  They went on in this fashion for some time, until one day L fell into an extramarital affair with an older man.

Some women have such bad sexual luck it kind of defies the imagination.  Were I writing about a young woman whose fears of sex were so profound that she could not come even by her own hand, even I would not think to give her a married lover who suggested penetrating her with a wine bottle for kicks.  Yet of course, truth being stranger than fiction, that is the kind of married lover she ended up with.

Add to this: her husband found out about the affair.  And threw her out of the house.  Her lover then left her too for another woman.

The young man who had loved L unrequitedly for years became her only lifeline.  One night, she told him that she needed to get over her sexual fears by going to a bar and picking someone up.  As a single man, she asked him to take her to some such place.  Of course, once they were there they ended up picking each other up instead, and at long last ended up in bed.

The next day, the lover believed they were now a Couple.  But L was shell-shocked from her wine-bottle affair and her divorce, and didn’t feel ready.  At long last, the lover had had enough and went off on his own.  Within months he was married, and that was the last she heard of him.

L remarried too.  She remained inorgasmic, but stopped worrying about it.  She made her peace with it, went to graduate school, became a couples therapist, and the rest was history.  She believed she was “content.”

Flash forward some twenty years.  The lover remained married all that time.  But he had never gotten over L.  Sometimes he drove past her old apartment and sat outside in his car playing music (he is a musician) and thinking of her and crying.  Yes, crying.  If we are to believe him, he thought of L constantly for years . . . the woman of his dreams, the only one he had ever loved.

One day last year, L was visiting her parents in her home state and decided on the spur of the moment to give him a call.  Thrilled, he suggested they go out to brunch: him, his wife, and L.

After the brunch, the wife said to L’s lover: I can see that you have always loved that woman.  I want you to either call her right now and offer to run away with her, or never, ever speak to her again.

The lover said something like, “Stop being histrionic.  She’s married.  She never wanted me.  Don’t worry, I’ll never hear from her again.”

Except, life being stranger than fiction, a funny thing happened at that brunch.

L realized that this man was the only man she had ever felt truly close to and comfortable with in her entire life.  She had realized he was the one for her–the one she should have been with all these years.  And so, once she returned home, she called him and before you know it they were both confessing their feelings.  After 30 years, the floodgates had opened.  Tears were shed.  Phone sex was had (though L, of course, did not come during these encounters.)  Phrases were used: Soul Mate; True Love.  And, of course, the usual plans: somehow they would run off into the sunset.

And then.  The lover’s wife, who is a bit older than he, had a stroke.

And then she had another.

The lover called L weeping.  He could not leave his sick wife, he told her.  A long distance affair was all they could ever hope for.

During our lunch, while L wept, saying she fears she has lost her one chance of real intimacy and happiness and sexual fulfillment, her lover kept phoning to find out if we were at the sex shop yet.  L had told him what we were up to, since he wanted her to be able to get off during their phone sex encounters too, and he was titillated.  At once point he wanted to talk to me.  At one point, L told me she had sent him my photo.  At one point, he asked if I would be giving L a tutorial.

My understanding is that he spends much of his time distraught and weepy just like L.  But the day that she was vibrator shopping was, um, not one of those days.

L had promised to take photos for him of our excursion.  She snapped some in the parking lot, but once we got inside the shop guy told her it wasn’t permitted in the store.  L was so crestfallen that I immediately pretended to be fascinated by an electric blue vibrator and engaged the shop guy in talking about it so that she could covertly snap more pics.  Then, feeling guilty, I had to buy the blue vibrator, which cost 30 bucks.

There must have been 300 types of vibrators in that store.  L and I were overwhelmed.  I have only ever had one vibrator in my life.  I’ve had it since college.  Back then, it was called something like a Lady Finger.  Now, when I found the same vibrator in the store, I found it had been relabeled “The Classic.”  The moral of that story is that I am old.

I told L to buy it.  I could not vouch for the others, but that one I knew worked like a charm.

She didn’t listen to me and bought some other newfangled thing that looked like it might explode if you pressed the wrong button.

We parted ways outside the store and she went off to O’Hare to catch her plane.

That was about four or five months ago now.  L used the vibrator 2 or 3 times, without success.  She found it too loud (her husband might hear), and too depressing.  She wanted her lover–who of course is not really her lover quite, but a man who lives in another state and will not leave his wife and who jacks himself off while talking to her on the phone–not a battery-operated toy.  She is supposed to see her beloved this fall, and maybe at that point she will get an orgasm out of it, but given how often she cries these days, I kind of doubt it.

There is such a thing as paralysis under pressure, too.

All in all, I find this whole business one of the saddest personal relationship stories a friend has ever shared with me.  Precisely why, I can’t even quite say.  Parts of it are, if not “funny,” certainly ironic.  Maybe it’s that I don’t really trust L’s lover, though in fairness it seems clear that earlier in life he truly was devoted to her, so I don’t really question that he has always loved her.  I question his “character” at times.  Yet in fairness, I cannot exactly say a man is an asshole for not leaving his wife who has had 2 strokes.  I don’t know what I “want” from L’s lover; I just know that what he is giving isn’t doing the trick, and that she is very, very sad, and not much closer to being sexually fulfilled than before.  I know that the clock is ticking, and both of these people have made some profound errors in judgment for which they may be paying for the rest of their lives, and that like some nun and priest, they cannot “have” the one thing that might make them happy without crossing a line of immorality to get it.

Would it really make them happy if they got it?  Well, of course that much is anyone’s best guess.  I only know it will make L forever unhappy not to be able to try.

Meanwhile, that blue vibrator was a fat waste of money.  When my husband saw it, he got as excited as L’s lover was on the phone the day of our excursion, so we tried it out.  But it’s short and squat, more like a plug, and vibrates so fast it could burn your clit off and bore a hole into your skin.  David suggested it was for “insertion,” but when we tried that it vibrated so fast that it would pop itself right out of me like a banana in a Dutch sex show and hit David right between the eyes.  We declared it a safety hazard.  I suggested sending it to L in the mail to see if she could make anything of it, but David said that was gross.  I clarified that I was going to cleanse it first, but he just shook his head in disgust.

This is twice the 1,000 word limit.  Sue me.  Sorry, Brad, I really do want to be in the book, but I’m wordy.

So, next time you’re counting your blessings that you’re not a victim of genocide in Darfur or a detained journalist in North Korea, add to these blessings your ability to come.  And if you have any fool-proof sex toys, send them to me and I’ll pass ‘em L’s way (just don’t tell David.)

*Note: If you are one of the few people who might be able to guess L’s real identity from this account, please do not divulge it here.  I’m writing this with her generous permission, but with the understanding that I will disguise her, so keep any theories about who she might be to yourself!

Share and Enjoy:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • Pownce
  • YahooMyWeb
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Blogosphere News
  • Reddit
  • Spurl
  • TwitThis

RSS feed | Trackback URI

52 Comments »

Comment by Zara Potts
2009-08-27 15:16:06

Gina, your story had me shaking my head in disbelief - you are so right, truth is stranger than fiction… But the irony!!! My god.

All I could think of when I was reading this was the quote from St Teresa of Avila, ‘More tears are shed over answered prayers than unanswered ones.’

But I hope L gets her happiness in the end. Oh, and a mind blowing orgasm.

 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-27 15:25:19

I know. Seriously. L’s lover keeps saying that she would have been happier had she remained unaware for the rest of her days that he had loved her all those years . . . she believes (and I guess is right) that such “happiness” would have been a kind of numb lack of feeling, but I have really come to question whether where she is now could possibly be preferable to that. I’m hoping for a happy ending to this story–if there is one, I’ll for sure write it for TNB!

Comment by Zara Potts
2009-08-27 15:27:56

I’m with you.. I kind of think it is sometimes best not knowing. After all, regret over what you HAVEN’T done is often worse that regretting what you have done. Oh I do hope for a happy ending.

 
 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-27 15:38:13

By the way, reading your Love Hurts TNB piece right now and it’s blowing my mind. I missed it in a frenzy of novel revising and then my 16 day mountain road trip.
Safe love. That means a lot of things.
I’m one of those high-maintenance, demanding lunatics who wants love to be both passionate/dangerous/intense and yet totally unconditional/accepting/irrevocable . . . which equals a kind of safety. A damn hard combination to find and to hold.
Hope that piece on writing you’re doing for the NZ publication is coming well!

Comment by Zara Potts
2009-08-27 15:45:28

Thanks Gina. Yeah, safe love can be just the tonic sometimes. Although I daresay L could do with some crazy love right now!
I relate totally to the high-maintenance/passionate/intense yet unconditional thing. There’s nothing quite like wild passion followed up with a nice hot chocolate with someone who loves you for exactly what you are.
The story is coming along.. but I’m going to companion it with a piece which I’ll write about my upcoming trip to LA for TNB off the blog reading in September.. Very exciting!

 
 
Comment by Simon Smithson
2009-08-27 15:52:48

Wow. How’s that for a messy situation?

Ironically enough, I was just talking to a friend about this last night - relationships, man. Those things are hard.

It’s a shame L’s never had her orgasm. I hope she gets one. I also hope that she ends up happy, and so does her star-crossed lover. Hell, I hope that for everyone.

 
Comment by Paul Clayton
2009-08-27 15:58:27

Too bad she didn’t make it. Probably the batteries. Duracell is supposed to be the best and will go the distance.

 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-27 15:59:47

Yeah, the thing that seems really sad in all this, Simon, is the amount of internal guilt involved for both L and her lover. I tend to think people have a right to be happy, short of running people over with their cars or torturing them for kicks or whatever, and personally can’t see how two people staying with spouses they don’t love (and crying all the time and sinking into depressions) can possibly be the “moral” choice. But obviously it’s complicated. There’s no black and white here. Seems like no matter what they do next, they’re a little doomed to feel bad.

 
Comment by Joi Brozek
2009-08-27 17:20:40

What a story! I would say, “tragedy,” but I prefer to have hopes for L and her lover. I think the expression, “no regrets” is something I learned as very important at a young age. Regret is one of the shittiest feelings in the world, and I can only imagine what they are both going through.

Comment by J. Hova
2009-08-27 17:29:48

I have learned from hard experience that, while you always end up with regrets to one extent or another, it is far easier to live with regrets over what you have done than over what you have not.

Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-27 17:47:14

I’ve heard this said both ways. But yes, in their particular case I can’t help but thinking that doing the “wrong” thing in leaving their spouses and being together would cause less regret in the long run . . . not the least of which because I don’t personally feel it’s a big favor to stay with a spouse while secretly being madly in love with someone else and not actually loving the spouse and staying only out of guilt. While I realize his wife is sick and not a young woman, I can’t help but feel that leaving her would actually be more “respectful” to her than staying because he believes she can’t get by without him, etc. Maybe that is naive or selfish or idealistic or something, though.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by J. Hova
2009-08-27 17:26:07

Sigh. Crap. I’m capable of great empathy and some decent wordsmithing but all I’ve got is… sigh… crap. Things will be what they will be but I hope, however it turns out, all parties end up happy and satisfied (in all ways).

Come to think of it, that seems a fair thing to wish for all of us, yes?

 
Comment by jmb
2009-08-27 17:50:35

My oh my
the algebras
of sex and love

after my big 1000 word blowout
I am so happy this is the tale
on top of me

Going back to read it again!

Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-27 17:58:32

I’m so tickled to get a jmb mini-poem as one of my responses.
I think this may be my first jmb poem.
I really feel like a full-fledged TNBer now.
Yea!

 
 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-27 17:56:18

Fair enough. But how few people really get that, eh? (Oh, this one’s to you, J. Hova, but in the wrong place.)

Comment by J. Hova
2009-08-27 18:14:41

Depends on your standards for both happiness and satisfaction. ;)

 
 
Comment by josie
2009-08-27 19:53:47

I just watched a show called the Future of Sex or something where they can implant a device in the spine and give orgasms on queue. Woman in the show said it was a truly monogomous relationship, her and her device.

If your friend doesn’t love her husband she should split. Staying together cheats them both from finding happiness. If the lover isn’t in love with his wife then he’s cheating her out of finding true love by perpetuating the marriage.

Life is short and love is sparse. They’re wasting time due to social mores - crap other people made up to suit their needs. You’re friends need to make up their own standards for love.

I’ve never owned a vibrator either and masturbation is positively dreadful. I’d want my lover in my bed, in my arms if I had one. No tools or technology between us.

Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-28 05:32:39

It’s true that masturbation loses a lot of its luster as you get older. When I was in college, I loved the very idea of “solo” because it was sort of the equivalent of those 1970s sitcoms where young women go out and make it on their own without a man–like the Mary Tyler Moore of sex or something. But once you’re older that “I’m an independent woman and can come on my own” thing has long since become old hat and doesn’t hold as much appeal, especially when you know you can “get it” from your husband whenever you like.
Still, I tend to think knowing how to make yourself come can help you know what you like with a lover, and help you to guide a lover if you happen to be someone with difficulties finding sexual pleasure like L–I mean, she may have to get comfortable with her own body first before someone else is able to bring her to those heights? Maybe.
I’m with you about leaving a marriage without love! But I’m also sympathetic to how age and illness (L’s husband is also in his 60s and his health isn’t ideal) may influence these decisions in ways that are . . . unfortunate and confining for all concerned.

 
 
Comment by Irene Zion
2009-08-28 03:42:26

Gina,
We missed the first madmen this season so we found it in the middle of the night and tivoed it.
the commercials wee outstandingly weird. I didn’t realize that middle-of-the-night commercials were of a different nature. Trojan makes this device, which you can only get on line, (I’m sorry Victor can’t remember the name either.) It’s pink and rubbery and has soft prickles like a bare toothbrush and you put it on your finger. That’s all they say so I don’t know if that’s it or there are batteries somehow involved. The setting is two women talking about it in a bank with an older lady at a desk behind them. Turns out they all three just LOVE it! Wish I could remember the name.

This is such a sad story. Poor L.

I’m sorry, but this is the line I loved the most, even though it doesn’t have to do with poor L.: “David suggested it was for “insertion,” but when we tried that it vibrated so fast that it would pop itself right out of me like a banana in a Dutch sex show and hit David right between the eyes. ”
David is a trouper, for sure.

2009-08-28 04:51:48

Irene - that Trojan thingy is just a more mass-produced version of the Fokoku 9000 - which is readily available from sex-shops and is a GOD-SEND. (I realizing I’m divulging too much about myself with this statement and might live to regret it –I live with many such regrets, alas–, but it’s all for “L”, right?)

2009-08-28 04:54:06
(Comments wont nest below this level)
2009-08-28 05:02:47

Side note / review: When I was working a gig in Cleveland, the housekeeper STOLE my Fukuoko 9000. It’s that good. Disgusting, and true.

 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-28 05:35:40

Kimberly, I’m sending this link to L as we speak. Seriously.
She’s also planning to read this whole thing, so if anyone has any direct advice for her, feel free to throw it onboard!
Loving the outpouring of support for her situation and all the wishes for her happiness and “satisfaction.”

 
Comment by Irene Zion
2009-08-28 07:06:04

People are afraid to order on line for fear they are placed on mailing & e mail lists for smut. Also, they don’t want to get a box in the mail with “Slutty Stuff” as the return address.

 
2009-08-28 07:13:34

Hence my link to the Amazon site and not Babes in Toyland. :)

While there, L can also order (and pre-order) several fine books by TNB authors as well!

 
2009-08-28 07:16:20

OOPS! Meant to write Toys in Babeland! (How embarrassing!)

Demanding edit button for responders. Right. Now.

 
 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-28 05:54:45

Kimberly, you are so high energy and productive even after apparently having 47 orgasms per day with your Fokoku that I hate to think of the way you’d be bouncing off the walls had you never met that little friend. The rest of us would be put to shame even further. Thank God for the Fokoku for tapping some of your energy and putting a smile on your face!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
2009-08-28 07:14:33

OH MY GOD!!!! (Can’t… Stop… Laughing…)

Can I borrow that for my Facebook status update??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-28 07:28:34

I’m waiting to see it on FB, honey!

 
 
 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-28 05:33:22

“David is a trouper.”
Truer words never spoken, Irene!
Can’t WAIT to meet you in Chicago. I am peeing a little right now just thinking about it!

Comment by Irene Zion
2009-08-28 06:53:26

Two of my sons and my daughter-in-law live there. Plus an endless stream of potential grandchildren! I will be in Chicago a lot!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
2009-08-28 04:53:09

Gina, I’m glad you’re wordy. I love your stories. So touching and heartfelt and funny and sad. I, too, L finds what she deserves… and right quick!

 
Comment by Mary
2009-08-28 06:25:18

Gina, I was just thinking yesterday about how orgasms are such an important part of, well, my health routine, you could say. I was thinking of it because once upon a time, I heard a story about a woman who lost weight supposedly just by putting on lotion every day. Obviously, there was nothing about the lotion that made her skinny, but it was a matter of making contact with her own body and skin that somehow kept her in touch with her well-being. It’s about self-love, you know? All healthy practices are — exercising, eating food that’s both good for you and enjoyable, going out once in a while, etc. Maybe your friend should try not to think of orgasms as some kind of homework assignment and start focusing on the sheer pleasure of getting there. I think she should stop focusing on the orgasm at all for a while and start thinking about just being turned on.

Lately, I am referring everyone I know to the blog http://dodsonandross.com by Betty Dodson and Carlin Ross. I find it hard to believe your friend hasn’t heard of Betty Dodson, but maybe this will help. If anyone gives great advice on sex, it’s these two genius women. Also, tell L to spend some time looking at sites like this one: http://beautifulanddepraved.tumblr.com/ It’s hot, but it’s also not too intimidating and over-the-top… although it’s possible that my idea of over-the-top is not quite normal…

Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-28 10:27:02

Going the check this out right now!
I have been accused my entire life of not having an appropriate barometer regarding what’s over the top and what’s not, so I’m sure I’ll be unable to judge on that count, but I couldn’t agree more that orgasms/sexuality are part of a person’s overall health. L works out, is fit and trim and muscular, watches what she eats, is clean, of course . . . yet it’s true that she doesn’t seem to view taking care of her sexual needs as something positive all people need to do for themselves, but rather as something depressing or (despite her progressive outlook on most matters) shameful and embarrassing. I can’t speak to where that comes from. There is no “abuse history” or any of the usual cliches, yet she has felt these ways for as long as she can remember. I have known her for almost 2 decades but never had any idea until recently that this was the case!
Who knows how many other people (probably women especially?) may be in similar boats without any of their friends or colleagues realizing it.
Okay, now going to check out Dodson and Ross.

Comment by Mary
2009-08-29 09:37:01

I don’t think there has to be an abuse history for a woman to feel ashamed or at least uncomfortable with her sexuality. I mean, look around at the way our media and our whole society treats women sexually… It’s such a pervasive attitude that it’s hard to pinpoint causes or even examples because they’re everywhere and we’re totally used to them. Consider how often magazines quote statistics about the percentage of women who never climax during sex (or at all), and then on the cover of the same magazine, “45 ways to blow his mind in bed!” It sends a strong message that sex really is more of a chore for women than a source of pleasure, and yet there’s this bizarre undercurrent of guilt and shame surrounding the fact that we’re not having orgasms. Before you can learn to have an orgasm, you have to learn that sex isn’t just something you do to make your partner shut up and go to sleep already.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mary
2009-08-29 09:39:52

PS
Contrary to Cosmo’s headlines, sex isn’t just a way to trap a man, either. If you’re looking for a way to trap someone, you need a therapist, not a boyfriend. (I know that’s sortof beside the point, but I felt a need to say it.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-29 10:08:37

You’re certainly right on all these points, Mary. I know L would really be nodding her head at the points you’ve brought up. She has definitely felt that sex was about “service” and “performance” and not about her. And I think one of the things she’s struggling deeply with now is the guilt that this “how to trap a man” mentality is part of how she got her second husband–by trying to be (and succeeding, for a time) exactly what she believed he (and all men?) wanted, and subverting all her own needs. She was reeling from her divorce and her botched, exploitive affair with an older man, and clung to him like a lifeboat and was willing to be whatever she thought she had to to keep him. He may have been doing similar things on his end, as he was on the rebound too. And what grew from that was a relationship that lacked real intimacy and genuineness, even though they have been together for many years.
There is no doubt in my mind that L has suffered a lot of shame about her womanhood/femininity despite not having been abused or explicitly told that being a woman was “bad.” Yes, I guess society surely does plenty of this without someone having to have been raped or whatever. It’s a fascinating thing how some women manage not to internalize these messages (at least not as deeply) and for other women they are so defining. What accounts for that? Some kind of biology–or environment, even in the absence of “abuse?” Who can say? I don’t think L herself can really fathom why she has been so tormented by some of these things, as she is a very intellectual and strong woman in most ways and would seem the sort of person who would “not buy into it.”
We can’t control fully what we buy in to.
The whole thing has made me more deeply aware of what people who seem to have it “all together” and to be kind of hard-asses may be carrying around inside.
By the way, awesome website! Hope everyone reading this will check it out!

 
Comment by Mary
2009-08-29 18:31:28

I think that idea of having it all together is part of the problem. There is this idea that if everyone thinks you have it together and then it turns out your sex life isn’t all you’d like it to be, then you are essentially admitting to a major flaw. It’s like a kid who’s always told “you’re so smart,” and then is scared of trying anything too difficult for fear of letting people see him struggle.

 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-30 02:41:06

You’re dead on with that, Mary. I myself was one of those kids for years, and put into that framework I see exactly what you mean, yes–it’s a huge leap to risk “failure” in any arena, yet you rarely get what you want or what will make you happy without risk. As it pertains to sexuality, I think you’re hitting on a lot, lot of things that are very applicable to L (geez, I should just give her your number!)

 
 
 
 
Comment by Ben Loory
2009-08-28 06:33:31

this isn’t tragedy or comedy, it’s just pathetic. you need character for tragedy, these people are just weak and indecisive. and you need, um, comedy, for comedy. mostly this just seems like one of those interminable french movies about horrible people vacationing at the beach. all it needs is a 17 year-old blond nephew exploring his sexuality and killing horseshoe crabs with a knife.

Comment by Irene Zion
2009-08-28 06:56:13

Oh no!
We’re about to go to a French movie!

Comment by Ben Loory
2009-08-28 07:09:32

bring a book!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Irene Zion
2009-08-28 09:06:05

It’s too dark to read and I’ve tried to use a book light at bad movies in the past but you get yelled at. I can’t take being yelled at. I cry.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Lenore
2009-08-28 11:24:02

i think L and L’s lover should move the fuck on. christ, join eharmony or something.

i can almost promise her that if she didn’t come with the vibrator, she’s not coming with the guy who has been married to a yucky old stroke victim forever.

 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-28 11:40:41

Lenore, I have to agree with you. I have been saying as much to L for months now. I think she needs to move on and find a new man, now that she realizes what’s what and knows she’s been lying to herself in various ways. Start fresh. Starting with learning to explore her own sexuality, then leaving the husband, and finally, yes, some kind of dating service or something where she can meet scads of new men who are actually available and lookin’ for love (and at least good sex!) But I guess this is easy for me to say.

 
Comment by Matthew Gavin Frank
2009-08-28 13:08:59

To borrow your refrain, Gina, “at one point” (the ending of this piece), I hoped it would run 3000 words. A brave, intimate piece that’s inspired my wife and me to re-rifle through all the oddly-shaped delights housing defunct batteries in our bottom nightstand drawer.

 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-28 13:15:40

Thank you kindly, sir.
Sorry to have missed you in Chi-town. Next time!

 
Comment by A.F. Passafiume
2009-08-29 04:02:51

Great post, Gina–loved reading it!

 
Comment by Alexander Chee
2009-08-29 08:39:36

My mind is blown.

All this because she’s anorgasmic? This is so sad! How did she become so afraid of her sexuality? Ye Gods.

Gina, this was a great run at the 1000 words, but really, you could turn this into an outline for a novel.

 
Comment by Gina Frangello
2009-08-29 10:35:15

Thanks!
As Mary and I were discussing above, there seem to be a myriad of ways for people, perhaps especially women, to become afraid of their sexuality. As such, it’s hard to say how much anorgasmia should “bother” such a person, I guess. But I’m afraid that here again, gender has a lot to do with that perception. I have never personally met a man who has never orgasmed. I’m sure there is such a man, somewhere in the world, but I’ve never heard of one. I’m guessing that if a man were unable to come, it might well be a pretty damn big deal to him, because it is: a) so deviant from the norm for men and b) easy orgasm is kind of considered a man’s birthright. After all, men HAVE to come in order to continue the species. Male pleasure is biologically linked to human survival.
Many women, on the other hand, never orgasm, or do so very infrequently, and barely seem to consider it an issue–or don’t consider it one at all. Many lead “normal” lives and even have fulfilling relationships. Certainly they have children and/or jobs, marriages, etc. There is no biological “need” for the female orgasm. Instead of being mandatory they fall under the category of “self-actualization.” It can be argued (and I would do so) that they are a natural part of good physical and mental health, but it could be equally argued (which I’d do also) that most people do not possess optimal physical/mental health, and so the female orgasm could be viewed as no “more important” than many of the other aspects of said health that are routinely foregone or sacrificed.
L fell into that camp of women who didn’t think they were that bothered by not coming for most of her entire second marriage, which is during the time I’ve known her. Only now that she’s fallen in love with someone has all this shit come up for her again, after many, many years dormant.
How inextricably is finding her orgasm to finding her “happiness?” I don’t know.
There’s definitely a novel in it all . . . but I don’t think it’s my novel to write.

 
Comment by Erika Rae
2009-09-04 16:37:28

Oh man - I love your words, Gina. All 2000+ of them. ( :

I feel sad for your friend - but I think there must be hope insofar as the orgasm is concerned. I keep hearing about women who have never had them, and then suddenly one day they figure it out. Ah, but what do I know? I’m no sex therapist.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post